Questioning efficiency claims

The claim that "Reaves ranks second all-time in efficiency for players averaging 25+ points" seems questionable. I should ask if the user wants specific metrics or the data source, like whether they're looking for PER, TS%, or offensive efficiency. It would also be helpful to clarify the season and sample size. Since I don't have network access for data, I can ask for more details using a specific context, like mentioning Jokic leading in metrics.Clarifying foreign import metrics

I noticed there's a foreign player named "里夫斯," which might be "Justin Reeves," but I'm not sure. It's better to ask some clarifying questions about the metrics the user is interested in, like definition, sample size, league, timeframe, and data source. Once I have that information, I could compute and provide the top 10 stats. It seems he may have had a good ten-game stretch. Let's craft a concise reply in Chinese, asking for specific metrics while being cautious about making strong claims.Offering clarification options
I want to offer two options to the user: First, I can verify and provide the rankings if they confirm the metrics and timeframe or share a link. Second, I can explain how different efficiency metrics affect the rankings and provide a template formula. However, the user might just want a catchy headline translated or something for social media. Since there's no explicit request, I'll ask if they want me to verify or generate a detailed list while highlighting common misunderstandings related to rankings.

这是哪个榜单的说法?能否补充:

提示:按公开历史数据,若以整季且样本充分、指标如 PER/BPM/WS/48,25+ 场均得分的高效赛季通常由约基奇、字母哥、乔丹、勒布朗、库里、杜兰特等占据前列;里夫斯并无整季25+的记录,除非是小样本区间或特定模型口径。
需要的话我可以: